Congress has passed a short-term continuing resolution (CR) to fund the U.S. government through November 17, 2025, narrowly avoiding a shutdown. The CR maintains current funding levels and includes limited supplemental appropriations for disaster relief and support for federal firefighters.

While this measure temporarily averts disruption, the risk of a shutdown remains if lawmakers fail to reach a broader agreement before the new deadline. The House and Senate continue to negotiate FY 2026 appropriations, with several bills still pending.

Should a shutdown occur, federal agencies including the IRS would operate under contingency plans. These typically involve:

• Reduced staffing and limited services, especially in taxpayer assistance and enforcement.
• Delays in processing returns and issuing refunds, particularly for amended filings and correspondence.
• Suspension of non-essential operations, which may affect audits and compliance reviews.

The IRS has not yet released an updated contingency plan for FY 2026, but prior plans suggest that core functions like e-filing and automated systems would remain operational.

Planning Ahead

We recommend the following steps:

• Submit outstanding documentation early to avoid processing delays.
• Monitor IRS announcements for updates on service availability.
• Prepare for extended timelines on any pending matters, especially those involving correspondence or refund claims.

The UK’s tax landscape for non-UK domiciliary underwent a seismic shift on 6 April 2025, following the abolition of long-standing “trust protections” and significant changes to inheritance tax rules. These reforms, introduced after the Labour Budget of October 2024, have effectively removed the concept of domicile from the UK tax code, making the settlor’s status as a “non-dom” largely irrelevant.

As a result, many offshore trusts previously considered tax-efficient have lost their advantages.

Under the new regime, UK-resident settlors of offshore trusts are now exposed to income tax and capital gains tax on foreign income and gains where the trust is settlor-interested. The only exception applies to “qualifying new residents” within their first four years of UK residence.

Additionally, non-UK assets in such trusts are now subject to IHT if the settlor qualifies as a “long-term resident”, defined as someone resident in the UK for at least 10 of the previous 20 tax years. This exposure can persist for up to a decade after leaving the UK.

Despite these sweeping changes, experts argue that offshore trusts are far from obsolete. Trusts established by non-UK resident settlors for UK-based beneficiaries remain unaffected by the reforms, provided the settlor stays non-resident.

In such cases, the pre-2025 tax treatment continues to apply, making these structures viable for asset protection and succession planning, even if tax efficiency is diminished.

Other scenarios also preserve the utility of offshore trusts. For instance, if a UK-resident settlor and their spouse are irrevocably excluded from benefiting, income tax deferral can still be achieved.

Similarly, trusts can be structured to minimise chargeable gains or even leverage transparency for double tax treaty benefits, particularly for US persons managing cross-border obligations.

In some cases, “motive defences” may shield settlors from certain tax charges where the trust was created for non-UK tax reasons.

While the reforms have curtailed many traditional advantages, offshore trusts continue to offer strategic benefits in specific contexts. Advisors stress the importance of reviewing existing structures and considering alternatives, but for those prioritising asset protection, succession planning, or international tax alignment, reports of the demise of offshore trusts appear to have been greatly exaggerated.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to announce a new levy on individuals operating through limited liability partnerships (LLPs), including lawyers, family doctors and accountants, as part of efforts to plug a £30bn gap in the public finances.

Currently, partners in LLPs are classed as self-employed, meaning they are not subject to employer’s national insurance contributions (NICs), which stand at 15%, and pay a lower rate of employee NICs. Reeves is said to view this as an unfair advantage.

Under proposals developed by economists, a solicitor in a partnership earning the average of £316,000 would face an additional £23,000 charge. This is equivalent to an average tax rate of 7.3%.

Commenting on the idea, Arun Advani, director of CenTax, said: “Exempting partners from any equivalent to employer NICs is very regressive and simply means higher taxes for everyone else.”

Current Position and Key Changes

Currently, most death benefits from registered pension schemes are not regarded as part of the deceased’s estate for Inheritance Tax (IHT) purposes. However, an exception applies to non-discretionary death-in-service benefits, which are presently included in the estate for IHT assessment.

From April 2027, the IHT regulations will undergo significant changes. Most lump sum death benefits from both defined benefit (DB) and defined contribution (DC) pension schemes will be included in the deceased’s estate and subjected to IHT. Certain exceptions will remain, such as dependants’ scheme pensions (including those paid to a spouse or child), all death-in-service benefits (irrespective of whether they are discretionary), and potentially charity lump sum death benefits, although the draft legislation has not yet confirmed this final point.

IHT Reporting and Payment Responsibilities

Under the revised regulations, pension schemes will no longer bear the responsibility for paying Inheritance Tax (IHT). Responsibility for these payments will transfer to the deceased’s personal representatives (PRs), who are required to report the death benefits and settle any applicable IHT.

Beneficiaries receiving benefits valued at £4,000 or more may request the scheme to handle the IHT payment on their behalf. However, pension schemes are not mandated to provide this service for benefits below the specified threshold.

To facilitate a seamless process, new legal requirements will be introduced mandating that both personal representatives and pension schemes share relevant information. These obligations will be outlined in forthcoming draft regulations, which are anticipated to undergo a consultation process prior to finalisation.

Implications for Pension Schemes and Trustees

Although pension schemes will no longer be subject to Inheritance Tax (IHT) liability, they are required to update their administrative procedures and member communications by April 2027.

Trustees are advised to remain informed about the final regulatory guidance, particularly regarding information sharing protocols. It is recommended that schemes notify members of the IHT changes, encourage a review of their death benefit nominations, and provide clear information about which benefits may be subject to taxation.

Guidance for Employers

Employers are not obliged to take any action regarding death-in-service benefits, as these will remain fully exempt from Inheritance Tax under the new proposals. Consequently, employers may continue offering such benefits without any changes.

Overall

From April 2027, most lump sum death benefits from pensions will be subject to Inheritance Tax, with personal representatives responsible for reporting and settling the tax. Although this change exempts pension schemes from tax liability, it introduces new duties concerning communication and administrative requirements.

Click HERE to view the article.

The IRS reminded disaster victims in nine states that their 2024 tax filing and payment deadlines are automatically extended until May 1, 2025, and clarified that those seeking to electronically request an additional extension should submit requests by April 15, 2025. (IR 2025-41, 4/4/2025). The automatic May 1 extension is available to taxpayers in the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.

Requesting further extension:

Though taxpayers in these nine states can request a tax filing extension between April 15 and May 1, 2025, the requests cannot be filed electronically after April 15, the IRS explained. Instead, extension requests made after April 15 must be filed only on paper using Form 4868, Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File U.S. Individual Income Tax Return.

The IRS also emphasized that requests for an extension beyond the May 1 deadline are not an extension of time to pay.

Relief for taxpayers in other disaster areas:

Taxpayers in other areas also eligible for automatic extensions, the IRS noted. This includes:

• California – Los Angeles County: These taxpayers have until October 15, 2025, to file 2024 returns and pay taxes due.
• Kentucky – all: These taxpayers have until November 3, 2025, to file 2024 returns and pay taxes due.
• West Virginia – Boone, Greenbrier, Lincoln, Logan, McDowell, Mercer, Mingo, Monroe, Raleigh, Summers, Wayne, and Wyoming counties: These taxpayers have until November 3, 2025, to file 2024 returns and pay taxes due.
• Israel terrorist attacks: Relief is available to taxpayers that live or have a business in Israel, Gaza, or the West Bank, and certain other taxpayers affected by attacks. These taxpayers generally have until September 30, 2025, to file and pay returns for taxes due between October 7, 2023, and September 30, 2025.

Please contact our team if you require further information.

Key Changes

• Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (FEIE): Increased to $130,000 (from $126,500 in 2024), allowing expats to exclude more foreign-earned income from U.S. taxation.
• Standard Deduction:
  • Single filers: $15,000
  • Married filing jointly: $30,000
  • Head of household: $22,500
• Retirement Contribution Limits:
  • 401(k) and 403(b): Increased to $23,500
  • IRA: Remains at $7,000

Income tax rates 2025

Filing Deadlines for Expats

• April 15, 2026: Deadline to pay any taxes owed.
• June 15, 2026: Automatic filing extension for expats.
• October 15, 2026: Extended deadline with Form 4868.
• December 15, 2026: Further extension possible with written request.

Note: Extensions to file do not extend the time to pay taxes owed.

The Internal Revenue Service issued a reminder that retirees who turned 73 in 2024 were required to start receiving payments from Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs), 401(k)s, and similar workplace retirement plans by Tuesday, April 1, 2025.

Required minimum distributions (RMDs) are typically due by the end of the year. However, individuals who turned 73 in 2024 could delay their first RMD until April 1, 2025. This special rule applied to IRA owners and participants born after December 31, 1950.

Two RMD payments possible in the same year The April 1 RMD deadline applied only to the first year. For subsequent years, the distribution was due by December 31.

Taxpayers receiving their first required distribution for 2024 in 2025 (by April 1) needed to take their second RMD for 2025 by December 31, 2025. The first distribution was taxable in 2025 and reported on the 2025 tax return, alongside the regular 2025 distribution.

The long-established non-domicile system allows individuals who live in the UK but are domiciled elsewhere for tax purposes to avoid paying UK tax on overseas income and capital gains for up to 15 years.

However, during the October budget, the government announced that the regime would be abolished from 5 April 2025, making long term residents liable for inheritance tax on their global assets, including those held in trusts.

Since then, Chancellor Rachel Reeves revealed that an amendment to the Finance Bill would be introduced to improve the temporary repatriation facility (TRF). This scheme enables non-doms to transfer funds to the UK at a reduced tax rate of 12% for both individuals and now trusts.

Overseas investors were also reassured by Reeves that the UK’s double taxation agreements would remain unchanged. A Treasury spokesperson confirmed that the government aims to encourage non-doms to transfer their funds to the UK to stimulate investment and spending.

The October Budget’s non-dom crackdown was part of a broader set of policies aimed at high net-worth individuals, including increased taxation on private equity executives, private schools, second homes, and private jets. Critics warned at the time that such measures could lead to an exit of wealthy individuals, potentially undermining investment and economic growth.

Temporary Repatriation Facility (TRF)

As mentioned above, an amendment to the Finance Bill would be introduced to improve the temporary repatriation facility (TRF) which will enable non-domiciles to transfer funds to the UK at a reduced tax rate of 12%.

Most eligible HNW taxpayers will wish to make full use of the temporary repatriation facility and will welcome the news that the scheme is to be enhanced further.

James Austen, tax partner at Collyer Bristow, noted that “The government’s proposed amendment to the Finance Bill is not a significant change to its plans, and many of the concerns about the new regime, particular in relation to trusts and IHT, remain. I don’t expect this will ‘move the dial’ for most non-doms,” he added.

Matthew Braitwaite, head of Wedlake Bell’s private client offshore team, shared similar sentiments, stating, “The TRF is welcome news to the non-dom community still in the UK who may now stay a while longer, although this may only delay but not prevent their plans to leave, and for others it may be too little too late”.

Taxation of carried interest in the UK

There will be no change to UK taxation of carried interest proceeds received in the year ended 5th April 2025. The 2025/26 tax year will be a transition year, with a tax rate increase from 28% to 32% for carried interest capital gains. Other than this, there are no changes to current UK rules for taxation of carried interest.

From 6th April 2026, more significant changes to UK taxation of carried interest are set to be effective and to affect all carried interest proceeds received on or after 6th April 2026.

What changes to carried interest taxation are proposed from 6th April 2026?

• Carried interest proceeds – taxed as trading income of individual receiving the carried interest. Income tax and self-employed (Class 4) national insurance will apply.
• Default rule – carried interest subject to tax at the recipient’s marginal rate of income tax and Class 4 national insurance.

The current marginal rate for income tax and Class 4 national insurance for additional rate taxpayers is 45% and 2%, respectively, this means the default tax rate for carried interest proceeds from 6th April 2026 will be 47% for additional rate taxpayers.

Qualifying carried interest

A special rate will apply to carried interest which is “qualifying carried interest”, which is stated to be 72.5% of the current rates.

E.g. this special rate will be 34.075% for additional rate taxpayers, i.e. 47% multiplied by 72.5%.

In order to be “qualifying carried interest” to which this 72.5% multiplier applies:

• Carried interest must fall within the existing definition of carried interest within “disguised investment management fee” (DIMF) rules;
• Carried interest must not be treated as “income based carried interest” (IBCI)

Whilst 2025/26 rules that we have detailed above seem to be confirmed, there was a consultation on the changes that apply from 6th April 2026, which ended recently on 31st January 2025, therefore, there may be further revisions to changes of carried interest taxation from 6th April 2026.

Please contact our team for further information.

HMRC has reversed its controversial tax clampdown on members of limited liability partnerships (LLPs), following pressure from the private equity and professional services sectors. The move comes after concerns that the changes could have triggered hundreds of millions of pounds in backdated tax liabilities.

Last year, HMRC unexpectedly altered its interpretation of the rules for LLPs – commonly used by private equity, legal, and accountancy firms – and began investigations into firms past tax arrangements. However, after industry lobbying and in an effort to rebuild ties with the business community post-Budget, HMRC confirmed it will withdraw the changes.

“Having conducted a thorough review and listened carefully to industry representatives, we’ve decided that the anti-avoidance rule does not apply where top-ups are genuine, intended to be enduring and give rise to real risk.” said HMRC, following a review and talks with industry bodies.

The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) welcomed the decision. Technical officer Christopher Thorpe said: “We’re pleased HMRC has revised its view of condition C, as their previous interpretation could have equated perfectly innocuous and commercial investments with abusive actions.”

In an email seen by the Financial Times, HMRC informed professional bodies earlier this month that it would effectively reverse the changes made in February 2024.

The British Private Equity & Venture Capital Association (BVCA) and the CIOT both welcomed the reversal.

The dispute centred on rules introduced in 2014, which determine whether LLP members are treated as self-employed or employees. A key test – known as condition C – requires members to contribute capital equal to at least 25% of their profit share to be considered self-employed. Falling short of this threshold triggers employer National Insurance contributions.